Monday, 6 January 2025

Review: Street Trash

Year: 2024 (UK Release 2025)

Director: Ryan Kruger

Screenplay: Ryan Kruger, James C Williamson, Roy Frumkes

Starring: Sean Cameron Michael, Donna Cormack-Thomson, Joe Vaz

Synopsis is here


In the age of content rehashing, it’s difficult to watch a remake of a cult hit without feeling a pang of cynicism. The first question on the lips is often “What’s the purpose of this?” with the answer being the IP being cheap far too often. The original Street Trash was an infamous 80s exploitation feature, part of an extremely specific pool of films described as “melt movies”. In these movies, toxic substances or similar materials would simply liquify characters in the movie into thick, viscous gloop. The original Street Trash played out like a series of vignettes in which a group of unhoused people fall afoul of some toxic alcohol and begin to disintegrate. There’s some vague plot involving a violent leader of a gang experiencing Vietnam flashbacks, however, the film is more of an exercise in offence, while also drawing focus on a sub-culture of people who were left out of mainstream cinema's indulgence in excess. Ryan Kruger's remake tries to delve into similar annals of shock value but is held together with more plot threads.

The year is 2050 and Cape Town is experiencing a gilded age. A large sector of the city is now homeless, with a smaller segment still being able to live well.  The city’s major has come up with a scheme to wash away the city’s homeless problem: melt them with drones. It falls to Ronald and his rag-tag group of friends to risk all they can and fight against a society and government who wish to exterminate them.

Whereas the original Street Trash dealt with neglect of the poor, this new remake has a lot more to say about the Government just plain wanting them dead. Street Trash redux makes some smart plays in its back pocket. Moving the action from Brooklyn to Cape Town has a lot more immediacy. The conspiratorial focus on shady government types looking to kill off the poor with toxic spraying drones holds a kernel of relevancy within its far-fetched shell. It’s chaotic multi-channel montage opening riffs on films like Robocop (1987) and District 9 (2009), and the general feeling is that the film isn’t merely giving you the same thing as before with a spit shine. Street Trash redux keeps the nostalgia pandering low and does what it can to stand outside its predecessor’s shadow.

However, the original Street Trash was cult for a reason. Its incessant need to try and offend with puerile humour got grating fast. The best thing going for it is its visuals and effects. The original has a decent moment of craft behind it. Even though it fills the screen with bland casual racism/sexism, it does so with a strong amount of visual flair. There was also a sincerity to its boorishness. This new version tries to follow suit but suffers from being born into a brave new world. Its attempts to be un-PC are even worse. Not because it’s more offensive. Considering the film is set in South Africa, the new trash feels more sensitive to race than the Brooklyn Trash, with the distinct feeling that the filmmakers were worried about watchful eyes. The original Street Trash’s humour felt baked in and organic. There was a devil-may-care nature to the original film that the second film doesn’t feel brave enough to ascribe to.  

The most effective thing about the new Trash is that it has more gloop, gore and violence. Kruger has more resources allowing him to invest in more florescent gut-busting. There’s a lot of Friday night beer fun to have while watching the film's effects. The film's main plot, while still scattershot, is still tighter than the original film, with the narrative lending itself to films like Brian Yuzna’s Society (1989). However, despite this, while consistency wasn’t a major part of the original trash, it certainly felt less scattershot. Kruger’s film is happy flinging things at the wall to see what sticks, including imaginary friends, Peep Show-like characters only seen in first person perspective, and surprisingly more stakes. Donna Cormack-Thomson’s female lead is seemingly in place to be an audience surrogate and give more emotional heft. It’s hard not to feel like her character is here to have people forget how badly the women in the original film were treated. That said, the more disintegrating bodies also look like they’re trying to do the same thing.

There’s still a small amount of fun to be had in places. The performances have a lot of gusto, while some of the more deadpan lines are also tittersome. And while visually the new Trash doesn’t have the same energy as the original, the film looks good for the most part. However, it’s probably not enough to recommend Street Trash. Its social relevance is welcomed, but it doesn’t have that much to say. The film has some bad taste but feels reluctant to go full throttle with things. But ultimately while Street Trash gives itself enough purpose to separate itself from its original movie, there’s not enough here to make it that memorable.


Street Trash will be in UK Cinemas from 10th January and on Digital and Blu-Ray from February 17th

Dug what you read? Support me on Ko-fi